|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Urban Structure
Urban structure develops in a dialogue of context and linearity. Important structural features of the surrounding quarters are continued and overlap with a system of linear urban and open-space areas. The heterogeneity of the environment and the direction of the railway tracks meet in a contextual grid whose structure allows flexible city growth that is open for utmost variability and dynamics of urban development. The individual areas are each assigned their own programmes, those of bordering areas being different.
|
 |
|
Use and Activities
Each urban and open-space area is attributed a framework of urban activities which is derived from the position in the urban structure. The character of an area is defined through its mixture of living and working as well as its degree of urban intensity. The result is an urban space with sequential density of events structured by lines of movement and floating open spaces. Landscape and urban areas exist next to each other in their own right and create a rhythm of open-space and building typologies which facilitates variability and the experience of different spaces, textures and activities over the entire area.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Urban Morphology
The building structures chosen are to establish typological features and selectivity between the individual urban areas without limiting the achitectural conversion too much. In fact, basic principles were applied which result from a contextual analysis of Munich city blocks. The three principles texture (interweaving), block (transformation), and solitaire (grouping) with their different density features are tranferred to the individual urban areas. The result is a space-saving urban structure of high compactness and density in the building areas, which forms an exciting contrast to the open spaces.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
2nd Phase, Elaboration Laim-Nymphenburg
|
 |